20 June 2021, Writing - part xx625 Writing a Novel, Plots and Classics, James Joyce
Announcement: Delay, my new novels can be seen on the
internet, but my primary publisher has gone out of business—they couldn’t
succeed in the past business and publishing environment. I’ll keep you
informed, but I need a new publisher.
More information can be found at www.ancientlight.com. Check out my novels—I think
you’ll really enjoy them.
Introduction: I wrote the novel Aksinya: Enchantment and the Daemon.
This was my 21st novel and through this blog, I gave you the entire
novel in installments that included commentary on the writing. In the
commentary, in addition to other general information on writing, I explained, how
the novel was constructed, the metaphors and symbols in it, the writing
techniques and tricks I used, and the way I built the scenes. You can look back
through this blog and read the entire novel beginning with http://www.pilotlion.blogspot.com/2010/10/new-novel-part-3-girl-and-demon.html.
I’m using this novel as an example
of how I produce, market, and eventually (we hope) get a novel published. I’ll
keep you informed along the way.
Today’s Blog: To see the steps in the publication process, visit my
writing websites http://www.sisteroflight.com/.
The four plus one basic rules I
employ when writing:
1. Don’t confuse your readers.
2. Entertain your readers.
3. Ground your readers in the writing.
4. Don’t show (or tell) everything.
4a. Show what can
be seen, heard, felt, smelled, and tasted on the stage of the novel.
5. Immerse yourself in the world of your writing.
These are the steps I use to write a novel including the
five discrete parts of a novel:
1.
Design the initial scene
2. Develop a theme statement (initial setting, protagonist,
protagonist’s helper or antagonist, action statement)
a.
Research as required
b.
Develop the initial setting
c.
Develop the characters
d.
Identify the telic flaw (internal
and external)
3. Write the initial scene (identify the output: implied
setting, implied characters, implied action movement)
4. Write the next scene(s) to the climax (rising action)
5. Write the climax scene
6. Write the falling action scene(s)
7.
Write the dénouement scene
I
finished writing my 29th novel, working title, Detective, potential
title Blue Rose: Enchantment and the Detective. The theme statement is: Lady Azure Rose
Wishart, the Chancellor of the Fae, supernatural detective, and all around
dangerous girl, finds love, solves cases, breaks heads, and plays golf.
Here is the cover proposal for Blue
Rose: Enchantment and the Detective.
|
|
|
Cover
Proposal |
The
most important scene in any novel is the initial
scene, but eventually, you have to move to the rising action. I am continuing
to write on my 30th novel, working title Red Sonja. I finished my 29th
novel, working title Detective. I’m planning to start on number 31, working
title Shifter.
How to begin a novel.
Number one thought, we need an entertaining idea. I usually encapsulate such an idea with a
theme statement. Since I’m writing a new
novel, we need a new theme statement.
Here is an initial cut.
For novel 30: Red
Sonja, a Soviet spy, infiltrates the X-plane programs at Edwards AFB as a test
pilot’s administrative clerk, learns about freedom, and is redeemed.
For novel 31: Deirdre
and Sorcha are redirected to French finishing school where they discover
difficult mysteries, people, and events.
For Novel 32: Shiggy
Tash finds a lost girl in the isolated Scottish safe house her organization
gives her for her latest assignment: Rose Craigie has nothing, is alone, and
needs someone or something to rescue and acknowledge her as a human being.
Here is the
scene development outline:
1. Scene
input (comes from the previous scene output or is an initial scene)
2. Write the
scene setting (place, time, stuff, and characters)
3. Imagine
the output, creative elements, plot, telic flaw resolution (climax) and develop
the tension and release.
4. Write the
scene using the output and creative elements to build the tension.
5. Write the
release
6. Write the
kicker
Today: Why don’t we go back to the basics and just writing a
novel? I can tell you what I do, and
show you how I go about putting a novel together. We can start with developing an idea then
move into the details of the writing.
To start a
novel, I picture an initial scene. I may
start from a protagonist or just launch into mental development of an initial
scene. I get the idea for an initial
scene from all kinds of sources. To help
get the creative juices flowing, let’s look at the initial scene.
1.
Meeting between the protagonist and the antagonist or the
protagonist’s helper
2.
Action point in the plot
3. Buildup to an exciting scene
4.
Indirect introduction of the
protagonist
Ideas. We need
ideas. Ideas allow us to figure out the
protagonist and the telic flaw. Ideas
don’t come fully armed from the mind of Zeus.
We need to cultivate ideas.
1.
Read novels.
2. Fill your mind with good stuff—basically the stuff you want
to write about.
3. Figure out what will build ideas in your mind and what will
kill ideas in your mind.
4. Study.
5. Teach.
6. Make the catharsis.
7.
Write.
The development of ideas is based on study and research, but
it is also based on creativity. Creativity
is the extrapolation of older ideas to form new ones or to present old ideas in
a new form. It is a reflection of
something new created with ties to the history, science, and logic (the
intellect). Creativity requires
consuming, thinking, and producing.
If we have filled our mind with all kinds of information and
ideas, we are ready to become creative.
Creativity means the extrapolation of older ideas to form new ones or to
present old ideas in a new form.
Literally, we are seeing the world in a new way, or actually, we are
seeing some part of the world in a new way.
I’ve worked through creativity and the protagonist. The ultimate point is that if you properly
develop your protagonist, you have created your novel. This moves us on to plots and initial
scenes. As I noted, if you have a
protagonist, you have a novel. The
reason is that a protagonist comes with a telic flaw, and a telic flaw provides
a plot and theme. If you have a
protagonist, that gives you a telic flaw, a plot, and a theme. I will also argue this gives you an initial
scene as well.
So, we worked extensively on the protagonist. I gave you many examples great, bad, and
average. Most of these were from
classics, but I also used my own novels and protagonists as examples. Here’s my plan.
1.
The protagonist comes with a telic
flaw – the telic flaw isn’t necessarily a flaw in the protagonist, but rather a
flaw in the world of the protagonist that only the Romantic protagonist can
resolve.
2.
The telic
flaw determines the plot.
3. The telic flaw determines the theme.
4. The telic flaw and the protagonist determines the initial
scene.
5. The protagonist and the telic flaw determines the initial
setting.
6. Plot examples from great classic plots.
7. Plot examples from mediocre classic plots.
8. Plot examples from my novels.
9. Creativity and the telic flaw and plots.
10.
Writer’s block as a problem of continuing
the plot.
Every great or good protagonist comes with their own telic
flaw. I showed how this worked with my
own writing and novels. Let’s go over it
in terms of the plot.
This is all about the telic flaw. Every protagonist and every novel must come
with a telic flaw. They are the same telic
flaw. That telic flaw can be external,
internal or both.
We found that a self-discovery telic flaw or a personal
success telic flaw can potentially take a generic plot. We should be able to get an idea for the plot
purely from the protagonist, telic flaw and setting. All of these are interlaced and bring us our
plot.
For a great plot, the resolution of the telic flaw has to be
a surprise to the protagonist and to the reader. This is both the measure and the goal. As I noted before, for a great plot, the
author needs to make the telic flaw resolution appear to be impossible, but
then it happens. There is much more to
this.
Here is our list of 112 classics. I told you this is a compilation of lists
from various sources. These are all true
classics in most every genre of literature.
What I’m going to do now is look at the list and evaluate if they
include a Romantic protagonist or a Romantic plot. Second, I’m going to mark those that are true
classic novels with an asterisk.
75Ulysses - James Joyce – No Romantic protagonist or Romantic plot.
77 The Big Sky Country – Arlo Guthrie
– Somewhat Romantic protagonist and Romantic plot.
78 Germinal - Emile Zola – No Romantic protagonist or Romantic plot.
79 Vanity Fair - William Makepeace Thackeray – No Romantic protagonist or
Romantic plot.
*80 The Black Arrow - Robert Louis Stevenson – Romantic protagonist and
Romantic plot.
*82 Treasure Island - Robert Louis Stevenson – Somewhat Romantic protagonist
and Romantic plot.
85 Madame Bovary - Gustave Flaubert – No Romantic protagonist or Romantic
plot.
86 For Whom the Bell Tolls – Ernest Hemmingway – No Romantic protagonist or
Romantic plot.
*87 Tarzan – Edger Rice Burroughs – Romantic protagonist and Romantic plot.
91 Heart of Darkness - Joseph Conrad – Somewhat Romantic protagonist and no
Romantic plot.
92 The Little Prince - Antoine De Saint-Exupery – Somewhat Romantic
protagonist and no Romantic plot.
*93 Huckleberry Fin – Mark Twain – Romantic protagonist and Romantic plot.
94 Watership Down - Richard Adams – Romantic protagonist and Romantic plot.
*95 Gulliver’s Travels - Jonathan Swift – No Romantic protagonist or
Romantic plot.
*96 Matilda – Roald Dahl – Romantic protagonist and Romantic plot.
99 Charlie and the Chocolate Factory - Roald Dahl – Romantic protagonist and Romantic plot.
*100 Les Miserables - Victor Hugo –
Romantic protagonist and Romantic plot.
*101 The Once and Future King – T.H. White – Somewhat Romantic protagonist
and Romantic plot.
*102 The Deerslayer – James Fenimore Cooper – Romantic protagonist and
Romantic plot.
104 Ben Hur – Lew Wallace – Romantic
protagonist and Romantic plot.
105 The Robe – Lloyd C. Douglas –
Romantic protagonist and Romantic plot.
106 The Pilgrim’s Progress – John Bunyan – No Romantic protagonist or
Romantic plot.
*109 The Call of the Wild – Jack London –
Romantic protagonist and Romantic plot.
*110 Stand on Zanzibar – John Brunner – No Romantic protagonist or Romantic
plot.
*111 The Shockwave Rider – John Brunner –
Romantic protagonist and Romantic plot.
I evaluated the list of plots and categorized them according
to the following scale:
Overall (o) – These are the three overall plots we defined above:
redemption, achievement, and revelation.
Achievement (a) – There are plots that fall under the idea of the
achievement plot.
Quality (q)
– These are plots based on a personal or character quality.
Setting (s)
– These are plots based on a setting.
Item (i)
– These are plots based on an item.
I looked at each novel and pulled out the plot types, the telic flaw,
plotline, and the theme of the novel. I didn’t make a list of the themes,
but we identified the telic flaw as internal and external and by plot
type. This generally gives the plotline.
Overall (o)
1. Redemption (o) – 17i, 7e, 23ei, 8 – 49%
2. Revelation (o) –2e, 64, 1i – 60%
3. Achievement (o) – 16e, 19ei, 4i, 43 – 73%
Achievement (a)
1. Detective or mystery (a) – 56, 1e – 51%
2. Revenge or vengeance (a) –3ie, 3e, 45 – 46%
3. Zero to hero (a) – 29 – 26%
4. Romance (a) –1ie, 41 – 37%
5. Coming of age (a) –1ei, 25 – 23%
6. Progress of technology (a) – 6 – 5%
7. Discovery (a) – 3ie, 57 – 54%
8. Money (a) – 2e, 26 – 25%
9. Spoiled child (a) – 7 – 6%
10. Legal (a) – 5 – 4%
11. Adultery (qa) – 18 – 16%
12. Self-discovery (a) – 3i, 12 – 13%
13. Guilt or Crime (a) – 32 – 29%
14. Proselytizing (a) – 4 – 4%
15. Reason (a) – 10, 1ie – 10%
16. Escape (a) – 1ie, 23 – 21%
17. Knowledge or Skill (a) – 26 – 23%
18. Secrets (a) – 21 – 19%
Quality (q)
1. Messiah (q) – 10 – 9%
2. Adultery (qa) – 18 – 16%
3. Rejected love (rejection) (q) – 1ei, 21 –
20%
4. Miscommunication (q) – 8 – 7%
5. Love triangle (q) – 14 – 12%
6. Betrayal (q) – 1i, 1ie, 46 – 43%
7. Blood will out or fate (q) –1i, 1e, 26 – 25%
8. Psychological (q) –1i, 45 – 41%
9. Magic (q) – 8 – 7%
10. Mistaken identity (q) – 18 – 16%
11. Illness (q) – 1e, 19 – 18%
12. Anti-hero (q) – 6 – 5%
13. Immorality (q) – 3i, 8 – 10%
14. Satire (q) – 10 – 9%
15. Camaraderie (q) – 19 – 17%
16. Curse (q) – 4 – 4%
17. Insanity (q) – 8 – 7%
18. Mentor (q) – 12 – 11%
Setting (s)
1. End of the World (s) – 3 – 3%
2. War (s) – 20 – 18%
3. Anti-war (s) –2 – 2%
4. Travel (s) –1e, 62 – 56%
5. Totalitarian (s) – 1e, 8 – 8%
6. Horror (s) – 15 – 13%
7. Children (s) – 24 – 21%
8. Historical (s) – 19 – 17%
9. School (s) – 11 – 10%
10. Parallel (s) – 4 – 4%
11. Allegory (s) – 10 – 9%
12. Fantasy world (s) – 5 – 4%
13. Prison (s) – 2 – 2%
Item (i)
1. Article (i) – 1e, 46 – 42%
I’d like to willow down the list of classics to some true
entertaining classics. We’ll then look
at these in more details.
Let’s do a little comparison between these classic works and
evaluate them. Here is how we will
evaluate them:
1.
Are they entertaining?
2. Would you read it again?
3. How’s the protagonist?
4. How’s the plot?
5. How does it relate to actual human values and life?
6. Did the author write in a way that makes this work truly
unique?
7.
Is this work important to humanity
and to the future?
There are two types of readers: the literary aware and the
literary unaware. The literary aware are
those who have been trained (so-called) in literature at some collegiate
level. That’s not necessarily something
to be proud of. Those who are literary
unaware are those who just love to read novels, and haven’t been propagandized
by the illuminati of literature.
In those who a basically unaware of literature in history,
your basic reader, the most owned but unread novel is The Lord of the Rings. I’ve already discussed this problem and this trilogy. For the educated in literature, the most
owned but unread novel is Ulysses by James Joyce.
As we shall see, Ulysses is barely a novel in any sense. It is a meaningless jumble of inarticulate words
that happen to be in English. There is
an identifiable but completely unremarkable and unimportant protagonist set in
an unreadable plot. The way you can tell
a person is uneducated or lying is by their opinion of Ulysses. The reason is simple—the novel is not
understandable or readable in the sense of any other piece of coherent writing
in the English language. I mean this
literally. If James Joyce was not in a
drug induced stupor while he “wrote” this novel, his mind was so jacked-up it’s
impossible to understand why he even made the effort.
Whoever published this novel either didn’t read it or was
totally befuddled by inanity.
Obviously, a inane, unentertaining, not understandable,
perverse, little read novel would automatically appeal to The British
Broadcasting Corporation. This is why such
an atrocity is found on their list of classics.
This also means you can tell what kind of readers are on their list
readers.
Ulysses is no
classic. It is not worth reading at all.
75Ulysses - James Joyce – No Romantic protagonist or Romantic plot.
I’m not sure how to describe Ulysses. It is a novel about a day in the life of Leopold
Bloom. Bloom is a henpecked, Irish, Jew,
living in Dublin. The novel takes place
in Dublin. The novel is a parallel to
the Odyssey by Homer. You won’t get
anything from Ulysses. I
recommend reading the Odyssey.
To be more specific, Ulysses is a “modernist” novel
written in a Cubist style. You should
understand Cubist art. That’s the art
that looks like a child produced it with primary colors and shapes jumbled
together to appear like something, but it’s difficult to tell what. That’s a perfect description of Ulysses. Much of the novel is taken up with the term
KMRIA, which means Kiss My Royal Irish A$$.
That’s it in a nutshell. I would
call Joyce a nutjob. Anyone who tells
you Ulysses is a great novel either hasn’t read it or is lying
to you.
Let’s evaluate this novel according to the criteria.
1. Are they entertaining?
2. Would you read it again?
3. How many movies/plays are there of the novel?
4. How’s the protagonist?
5. How’s the plot?
6. How does it relate to actual human values and life?
7. Did the author write in a way that makes this work truly
unique?
8.
Is this work important to humanity
and to the future?
Ulysses is in no way
entertaining. It is the opposite of
entertaining. It is literally a jumble
of incoherent worlds typed on paper.
There is no cohesiveness to it. A
quick run through it will show you exactly how terrible it is. Most people who claim to have read it have
only heard that it is supposed to be sophisticated and good. The reality is that most who claim to have
read it have never read it. I find it
difficult to declare Ulysses a novel.
A novel should have a protagonist, a plot, and be entertaining. Entertaining is number one—there is no entertaining
in Ulysses.
I have read Ulysses twice. Don’t ask me why. In my developmental stage as a human and a
writer, Ulysses was peddled to me as a great piece of literature. I read the novel to see what a really great
piece of literature was. I found myself
writing a paper and making a study of the book.
Like more students, I was enraptured by the illuminati who claimed to understand
writing and great literature. Since that
time, I’ve learned that most of these people are over educated idiots who have
never written or had published any piece of legitimate writing. They are wannabe authors who don’t understand
the first thing about writing entertaining works the average reader wants to
read. They claim some degree of understanding
of literature, but completely misunderstand the purpose of literature—to entertain. That’s the problem with Ulysses. It is not entertaining.
No one would or could make an accurate adaptation of a novel
with zero plot and just jumbled words on a page. Indeed, no one would watch such a
monstrosity. People have claimed to have
made adaptations of Ulysses, but all of them are simply made up shows
about the movement of Leopold Bloom around Dublin. Everything else has to be made up—unless you
include the toilet scene.
There is no there in Leopold Bloom. He is no protagonist that anyone could
recognize as a protagonist. He breaks every
rule and idea that Aristotle put on paper (or parchment or sheep hide) about
tragedy, comedy, plots, and protagonists.
There is no there there in Ulysses.
Romantic plot? Is
there even any plot in Ulysses. I’d
say you read it and tell me. Sure, there
is some type of plot in One Fish, Two Fish, Red Fish, Blue Fish. I’d say the plot in Dr. Suess is a thousand
times better and more entertaining than in Ulysses. If you don’t believe me, just read the book.
Ulysses
is not about any values unless they are toilet values. Yes, you get an entire diatribe on scats and
intestinal evacuation including the consumption of various foodstuffs and their
eventual defecation into an outhouse hole by Leopold. There are no human values in this book. This isn’t about humanity at all. If you want humanity, you need to start with
humans and the intentions of humans. Ulysses
just as the parallel implies is about the gods and heroes, so-called, in the
modern era. Joyce doesn’t think there
are any—silly idiot.
There is a unique quality in Ulysses. That unique quality is why anyone in their
right mind would read it or publish it. This
novel is obviously printed and published to be able to willow the educated and
clueful from the over-educated and deceitful.
Anyone who reads it knows it is a farce.
Those who can see this or are unafraid to express this are worth
listening to. Those who either fake it
or surreptitiously promote it as good are obviously either deluded or liars. You choose.
If you don’t believe me, just read it.
Don’t pay for it. That would be a
waste.
Ulysses is obviously
not the future, past, or present of any literature. If it was, you would see a million pretenders
writing and publishing tomes just like it.
There are none. It is a one off
fake that parades as a novel. There is
no future in reading it or even expressing it.
Heard any good quotes from it? Ha
ha.
James Joyce was no writer.
He was a pretensive imposture who claimed to write. As I noted, his books are a test. If you think they are good, it’s probably
time for you to really read some good literature. If you think they are terrible, you got
it. If his books were a joke or just a
test, they would make sense. Why they
are read, published, or pontificated about by the literary illuminati shows
more about the illuminati than anything else.
We’ll look at Arlo Guthrie next.
In the end, we can figure out what makes a work have a great
plot and theme, and apply this to our writing.
The beginning of creativity is study and effort. We can use this to extrapolate to
creativity. In addition, we need to look
at recording ideas and working with ideas.
More tomorrow.
For more information, you can visit my author site http://www.ldalford.com/, and my individual novel websites:
http://www.ancientlight.com/
http://www.aegyptnovel.com/
http://www.centurionnovel.com
http://www.thesecondmission.com/
http://www.theendofhonor.com/
http://www.thefoxshonor.com
http://www.aseasonofhonor.com
No comments:
Post a Comment