My Favorites

Monday, May 27, 2019

Writing - part x871, Writing a Novel, Changing World and more Logical Truth

27 May 2019, Writing - part x871, Writing a Novel, Changing World and more Logical Truth

Announcement: Delay, my new novels can be seen on the internet, but my primary publisher has gone out of business—they couldn’t succeed in the past business and publishing environment.  I'll keep you informed, but I need a new publisher.  More information can be found at www.ancientlight.com.  Check out my novels--I think you'll really enjoy them.

Introduction: I wrote the novel Aksinya: Enchantment and the Daemon. This was my 21st novel and through this blog, I gave you the entire novel in installments that included commentary on the writing. In the commentary, in addition to other general information on writing, I explained, how the novel was constructed, the metaphors and symbols in it, the writing techniques and tricks I used, and the way I built the scenes. You can look back through this blog and read the entire novel beginning with http://www.pilotlion.blogspot.com/2010/10/new-novel-part-3-girl-and-demon.html.

I'm using this novel as an example of how I produce, market, and eventually (we hope) get a novel published. I'll keep you informed along the way.

Today's Blog: To see the steps in the publication process, visit my writing website s http://www.sisteroflight.com/.
The four plus one basic rules I employ when writing:
1. Don't confuse your readers.
2. Entertain your readers.
3. Ground your readers in the writing.
4. Don't show (or tell) everything.
     4a. Show what can be seen, heard, felt, smelled, and tasted on the stage of the novel.
5. Immerse yourself in the world of your writing.
These are the steps I use to write a novel including the five discrete parts of a novel:

1.     Design the initial scene
2.     Develop a theme statement (initial setting, protagonist, protagonist’s helper or antagonist, action statement)
a.     Research as required
b.     Develop the initial setting
c.     Develop the characters
d.     Identify the telic flaw (internal and external)
3.     Write the initial scene (identify the output: implied setting, implied characters, implied action movement)
4.     Write the next scene(s) to the climax (rising action)
5.     Write the climax scene
6.     Write the falling action scene(s)
7.     Write the dénouement scene
I finished writing my 29th novel, working title, Detective, potential title Blue Rose: Enchantment and the Detective.  The theme statement is: Lady Azure Rose Wishart, the Chancellor of the Fae, supernatural detective, and all around dangerous girl, finds love, solves cases, breaks heads, and plays golf.  
Here is the cover proposal for Blue Rose: Enchantment and the Detective
Cover Proposal
The most important scene in any novel is the initial scene, but eventually, you have to move to the rising action. I am continuing to write on my 30th novel, working title Red Sonja.  I finished my 29th novel, working title Detective.  I’m planning to start on number 31, working title Shifter
How to begin a novel.  Number one thought, we need an entertaining idea.  I usually encapsulate such an idea with a theme statement.  Since I’m writing a new novel, we need a new theme statement.  Here is an initial cut.

For novel 30:  Red Sonja, a Soviet spy, infiltrates the X-plane programs at Edwards AFB as a test pilot’s administrative clerk, learns about freedom, and is redeemed.

For novel 31:  Deirdre and Sorcha are redirected to French finishing school where they discover difficult mysteries, people, and events. 

Here is the scene development outline:

1. Scene input (comes from the previous scene output or is an initial scene)
2. Write the scene setting (place, time, stuff, and characters)
3. Imagine the output, creative elements, plot, telic flaw resolution (climax) and develop the tension and release.
4. Write the scene using the output and creative elements to build the tension.
5. Write the release
6. Write the kicker
          
Today:  Why don’t we go back to the basics and just writing a novel?  I can tell you what I do, and show you how I go about putting a novel together.  We can start with developing an idea then move into the details of the writing. 

To start a novel, I picture an initial scene.  I may start from a protagonist or just launch into mental development of an initial scene.  I get the idea for an initial scene from all kinds of sources.  To help get the creative juices flowing, let’s look at the initial scene. 

1.     Meeting between the protagonist and the antagonist or the protagonist’s helper
2.     Action point in the plot
3.     Buildup to an exciting scene
4.     Indirect introduction of the protagonist

The protagonist is the novel and the initial scene.  If you look at the four basic types of initial scenes, you see the reflection of the protagonist in each one.  If you noticed my examples yesterday, I expressed the scene idea, but none were completely independent of the protagonist.  Indeed, in most cases, I get an idea with a protagonist.  The protagonist is incomplete, but a sketch to begin with.  You can start with a protagonist, but in my opinion, as we see above, the protagonist is never completely independent from the initial scene.  As the ideas above imply, we can start with the characters, specifically the protagonist, antagonist or protagonist’s helper, and develop an initial scene. 

Let’s look at a subject that is really ignored in the modern era.  I’m not certain how much this can help your current writing.  I would argue that theoretically, this subject can really help those who write historical and futuristic fiction.  It depends on how your write your historical and futuristic fiction.  There are two ways to write historical fiction—let’s look at this.

The first and most common way to write historical fiction is to write a novel that projects modern ideas and history as historical ideas and history.  In other words to present modern ideas and historical ideas as the same.  I think this is perhaps the most egregious and perverse means of presenting a false view of history.  The author is either completely ignorant of the past, is intentionally attempting to education people in a false view of history, or both.  The real historical world is very different both culturally and socially from our current world.  The true author attempts to convey this in historical writing.

The second and less common means of historical writing is to actually incorporate the past into a novel to convey the actual way people thought and acted in the past.  This approach actually goes back into time to give a complete view of the way the people thought and acted.  To this end, let’s look at how the world changed and how people thought in the past.  This is more of a historical look at the world for the purpose of understanding how the world worked in the past and how people thought and acted.  We’ll use historical information to see what concerned affected their lives. Here is a list of potential issues.  We’ll look at them in detail:

1.   Vocabulary
2.   Ideas
3.   Social construction
4.   Culture
5.   Politics
6.   History
7.   Language
8.   Common knowledge
9.   Common sense
10. Reflected culture
11. Reflected history
12. Reflected society
13. Truth
14. Food
15. Weapons
16. Transportation
17. Communication
18. Writing 

What is truth?  Actually, this isn’t a very difficult question to answer.  My personal opinion is that a person who doesn’t know how to discover the truth is uneducated and inexperienced.  The Greeks developed the three means to know truth stating back about 500 BC.

The Greeks wondered, no, the Greeks knew there were other things in the world which were real, but not discernable or measurable.  History and the historical-legal method could not prove them.  The Greeks had an inkling that logic could.

Think about it.  Spiritual things, gods, emotions, thoughts, ideas, all these things can’t really be measured in the real world.  The Greeks took what they learned in logic as applied to geometry and proofs.  On the way, they invented philosophy.  Philosophy uses logic and the historical-legal method to reason and then record that reasoning. 

Logic and reasoning propelled philosophy and later theology.  As I noted, with the historical-legal method, the philosopher could then record their philosophical reasoning and we got Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Zeno, and all those great Greek and later other philosophers.  The Greeks had the right idea.  They applied logic to everything they could.  Their most important question was to prove god and define the spiritual.  They also wanted to define the ge (the real world), but logic wasn’t as fitted for this job as was another tool.  I’ll get to that later. 

In any case, the Greeks used logic and reasoning to try to understand and define the world and their perception of reality.  This moved in history to philosophy and then theology.  Philosophy then and now was interested in many questions and ideas.  Logic can be used to evaluate all kinds of real and intellectual ideas.  It can be used to define truth in all kinds of ways, and it can be used to support the historical-legal method.  The most important question for philosophy is the proof and person of god.

Philosophy examined this idea from the beginning.  If you didn’t know, Emmanuel Kant proved that the not god can’t exist.  If you remember from geometry, you can’t prove a true—you can only prove a not true.  Since you can’t prove a true, the logistician (philosopher) defines the proof of anything as a proof that the not true must not exist.  The Greeks knew this and Emmanuel Kant proved the not god can’t exist—there must be a god.  So, Emmanuel Kant solved the greatest problem in philosophy and reason.  If you wondered, that’s what happened to philosophy.

You might have noticed the lethargy and silliness of modern philosophy.  The reason is that no one can prove Emmanuel Kant wrong.  His proof of God is remarkable and so far, not refutable.  Philosophy hasn’t stopped trying, but today philosophy has become less than a distraction.  In fact, they didn’t stop teaching philosophy, but they stopped teaching logic and reasoning.  I guess the modern philosophers are embarrassed or irritated at what Kant has done.  I would have thought they would have shouted the results of Kant’s proof to the heavens.  It proves the great question of mankind—there is a God, there has to be.

If you don’t think this is a big deal, perhaps you are a philosopher.   

More tomorrow.

For more information, you can visit my author site http://www.ldalford.com/, and my individual novel websites:

fiction, theme, plot, story, storyline, character development, scene, setting, conversation, novel, book, writing, information, study, marketing, tension, release, creative, idea, logic

No comments:

Post a Comment