20 October 2015, Writing Ideas
- New Novel, part 558, more Words Best Not Employed Q and A
Announcement: Delay, my new novels can be seen on the internet, but the publisher
has delayed all their fiction output due to the economy. I'll keep you
informed. More information can be found at www.ancientlight.com. Check out my novels--I think you'll really enjoy
them.
Introduction: I wrote the novel Aksinya: Enchantment and the Daemon.
This was my 21st novel and through this blog, I gave you the entire novel in
installments that included commentary on the writing. In the commentary, in
addition to other general information on writing, I explained, how the novel
was constructed, the metaphors and symbols in it, the writing techniques and
tricks I used, and the way I built the scenes. You can look back through this
blog and read the entire novel beginning with http://www.pilotlion.blogspot.com/2010/10/new-novel-part-3-girl-and-demon.html.
I'm using this novel as an example
of how I produce, market, and eventually (we hope) get a novel published. I'll
keep you informed along the way.
Today's Blog: To see the steps in the publication process, visit my
writing website http://www.ldalford.com/ and select "production
schedule," you will be sent to http://www.sisteroflight.com/.
The four plus one basic rules I
employ when writing:
1. Don't confuse your readers.
2. Entertain your readers.
3. Ground your readers in the
writing.
4. Don't show (or tell) everything.
5. Immerse yourself in the world of
your writing.
All novels have five discrete parts:
1. The initial scene (the
beginning)
2. The rising action
3. The climax
4. The falling action
5. The dénouement
The theme statement
of my 26th novel, working title, Shape, is
this: Mrs. Lyons captures a shape-shifting girl in her pantry
and rehabilitates her.
Here is the cover proposal for Escape
from Freedom. Escape is my 25th novel.
The most important scene in any
novel is the initial scene, but eventually, you have to move to the rising
action. I'm on my first editing run-through of Shape.
I'm
an advocate of using the/a scene input/output method to drive the rising
action--in fact, to write any novel.
Scene development:
1. Scene input (easy)
2. Scene output (a little
harder)
3. Scene setting (basic stuff)
4. Creativity (creative
elements of the scene)
5. Tension (development of
creative elements to build excitement)
6. Release (climax of creative
elements)
I can immediately discern three ways
to invoke creativity:
1. History extrapolation
2. Technological extrapolation
3. Intellectual
extrapolation
Creativity is like
an extrapolation of what has been. It is a reflection of something
new created with ties to the history, science, and logic (the
intellect). Creativity requires consuming, thinking, and producing.
One of my blog readers posed these
questions. I'll use the next few weeks to answer them.
7. Words employed
8. Sentence length
9. Complexity
10. Type of grammar
11. Diction
12. Field of reference or
allusion
13. Tone - how tone is created
through diction, rhythm, sentence construction, sound effects, images created
by similes, syntax/re-arrangement of words in sentence, the inflections of the
silent or spoken voice, etc.
14. Mannerism suggest by
speech
15. Style
16. Distinct manner of writing
or speaking you employ, and why (like Pinter's style includes gaps, silences,
non-sequitors, and fragments while Chekhov's includes 'apparent'
inconclusiveness).
Moving on to 7. 7.
Words employed
The list is gone. I’d would be nice to keep it up and add to it
as I thought of more classics. I want to
give you more ideas about the employment of words or the right word for the
moment, but I’m going to come from a different point of view for a moment. Let’s look at words not to use. Here’s the list:
-ing
had
-ly
were
was
gotten
even
said
-ly
was
gotten
even
said
got
utilize
These
are words you want to reduce in your writing.
If you check every use of had, was, and were, you will get rid of most
incorrect –ing constructions too. Here
is a little more on the –ing construction in English.
-ing
Replace
weak present participle constructions like:
He
was walking.
(with
strong past tense verb constructions like)
He
walked.
-ing
Constructions in English
I'm
kind of irritated about this issue. I
already wrote that present participle constructions are an indication of bad
writing. They are a distraction and
should only be rarely used in good fiction.
In general, they should not be used at all unless you fully understand
them. Perhaps the problem is identifying
and correcting present participle constructions. I will go through the different -ing constructions
and usage in English and show exactly what I am talking about. (If you can pick out the present participle
constructions in the above paragraph, you pass.) Note, that these constructions
are effective above because this is not fiction writing, but rather an
instructional essay. Also, I used
present tense.
Nouns
We
are not talking about nouns that happen to have an -ing ending. Nouns are good. Building, thing, being, etc. are not the
problem. Please use these words
appropriately and accurately and no one will complain.
Gerunds
Gerunds
can become annoying, but these aren't the focus of my jihad either. Gerunds are a verb that acts as a noun. Gerunds can be a subject (nominative) or
object (accusative) of a main verb.
Examples of gerunds are:
Studying
is good for you.
I
participate in trading.
Gerunds
are a legitimate means of turning a great action word (verb) into a great
noun. Please do so with care and always
use the appropriate word--do not use gerunds to replace stronger nouns or to
pervert good verbs.
Adjectives
A
present participle can be used as an adjective.
This can also be overdone, but it is a completely reasonable and good
way to write. Here are some examples:
She
was a fascinating woman.
An
interesting man accosted me.
Using
a present participle in this manner is completely acceptable and can add real
zest to your writing. (Note: I used a gerund at the beginning of this
sentence.)
Verbs
The
problem with the present participle form is when it is used as a verb. This form should only be used in the very
rare case of indicating an immediate present tense event--even then it is
dangerous and should never be used if it can be replaced with a common and past
tense or perfect tense construction.
What do I mean? Whenever you see
a verb construction of this form, you should flinch: to be (verb) + verb-ing.
He
was singing.
She
was engaged in fighting the horrid monster.
He
was opposing the forces of darkness and present participles.
Rewrite
these sentences in simple past tense.
He
sang.
She
fought the horrid monster.
He
opposed the forces of darkness and present participles.
When
you see a was followed by a present participle form--fix it.
Participle
phrases, dangling or otherwise are rarely worth reading. Don't use them. Here's what I mean:
Ginny
stood. Glancing behind her, she nodded
and turned to go.
Why
not write:
Ginny
stood. She glanced behind her, nodded
and turned to go.
or
Ginny
stood and glanced behind her. She nodded
and turned to go.
Wow,
no more participle phrase. It sounds
better, looks better, and reads better.
The first example is what you expect from a middle schooler; the rewrite
is what you expect from a professional.
Here
is another example:
The
people skipped joyfully around Tina, reaching to touch her, straining to meet
her gaze.
Instead
write:
The
people skipped joyfully around Tina and reached out to touch her, strained to
meet her gaze.
or
The
people skipped joyfully around Tina.
They reached out to touch her, strained to meet her gaze.
Are
participle phrases ever reasonable? If
they are part of a prepositional phrase, you betcha. You decide.
Here is an example from Shadowed Vale:
Den
flipped off his Combat Environment Suit’s visual sensors. He glanced at Natana in the driver’s
seat. A slight hum leaked from between
her lips. She managed the vehicle with
cat-like reflexes. Her mind took in a
million bits of information every second and computed it. She turned it into precise movements of the
controls. No one in the universe could
think of driving this kind of vehicle at this speed across the sands of Acier,
but Natana could. She could have
conversed with Den at the same time and run a few other advanced computations
through her brain. Den knew that, but he
didn’t want to risk a break in her concentration. His was really an irrational view, but he
didn’t want to risk her life or his. He
was too invested in her—he loved her too dearly. She was just always like this. She lived her life at the edge—always on the
edge. Den hoped to be her governor—like
the governor on a generator or a nuclear reactor to keep it from running out of
control. Never her overseer. Perhaps her leader. Natana might like that. She was a fantastic First Officer for the
Family Trader Vessel, Regia Anglorum, and he was the Captain.
The
answer is yes! Note how the present
participle is used as a part of a complex sentence. In each case, it is preceded by a
preposition. The phrases are
prepositional phrases using a present participle as the verb. You can overdo this too, but it is a
reasonable and normal means of writing about complex ideas. This kind of writing can be rich. It is as simple and direct as possible. That's the point.
Now,
when are straight present participle constructions appropriate?
In
the rare case where you want to specifically indicate a current condition:
Right
now, they were searching for a long lost psyonic facility on the surface of
Acier. - Shadowed Vale
Changing
this sentence to past tense loses the immediacy.
Right
now, they searched for a long lost psyonic facility on the surface of Acier.
Still,
it could be easily made past tense.
Needless to say, this is almost the only present participle use in the
entire 118,000 word novel. The use is
specific to draw the reader to the "now" from a section that is a
flashback--and there is the purpose. In
this case, it intentionally draws the reader back out of a flashback to the
immediate events of the novel.
Here
is an example from a writer friend's awesome novel As Eagles:
She
was eating her breakfast now. She sat
with perfect posture alone in her house. - As Eagles, Alison Pickrell
You
can easily turn this sentence into past tense:
She
ate her breakfast now.
If
you do this, you lose the feel Ms. Pickrell is trying to develop (note the
present participle construction in this sentence). Her point is to set an event in the now and
draw the reader into it.
The
point is that if you understand what you are doing (note the present participle
use), you can use present participle constructions in your fiction writing
(verb as a noun). If you find more than
one a chapter you need to fix them. And
I ain't kidding!
By
the way, if you are writing in present tense, everything I said about present
participle verbs change. Why you would
write a novel in present tense? I don't
know; that would be annoying in itself.
It's been done poorly and well in the past, but mostly, it's just
annoying.
One
final note. Conversation in the present
tense is an appropriate place to use the present participle (present
participle, present tense--get it). You
can still overdo it--so watch out. The
proscription of the present participle is in a past tense narrative--that's
where it becomes annoying and is an indicator of poor writing.
More
tomorrow.
For more information, you can visit my author site http://www.ldalford.com/, and my individual novel websites:
For more information, you can visit my author site http://www.ldalford.com/, and my individual novel websites:
http://www.ancientlight.com/
http://www.aegyptnovel.com/
http://www.centurionnovel.com
http://www.thesecondmission.com/
http://www.theendofhonor.com/
http://www.thefoxshonor.com
http://www.aseasonofhonor.com
fiction, theme, plot, story, storyline,
character development, scene, setting, conversation, novel, book, writing,
information, study, marketing, tension, release, creative, idea, logic
http://www.aegyptnovel.com/
http://www.centurionnovel.com
http://www.thesecondmission.com/
http://www.theendofhonor.com/
http://www.thefoxshonor.com
http://www.aseasonofhonor.com
No comments:
Post a Comment