21 October 2015, Writing Ideas
- New Novel, part 559, Present Participle Words Best Not Employed Q
and A
Announcement: Delay, my new novels can be seen on the internet, but the publisher
has delayed all their fiction output due to the economy. I'll keep you
informed. More information can be found at www.ancientlight.com. Check out my novels--I think you'll really enjoy
them.
Introduction: I wrote the novel Aksinya: Enchantment and the Daemon.
This was my 21st novel and through this blog, I gave you the entire novel in
installments that included commentary on the writing. In the commentary, in
addition to other general information on writing, I explained, how the novel
was constructed, the metaphors and symbols in it, the writing techniques and
tricks I used, and the way I built the scenes. You can look back through this
blog and read the entire novel beginning with http://www.pilotlion.blogspot.com/2010/10/new-novel-part-3-girl-and-demon.html.
I'm using this novel as an example
of how I produce, market, and eventually (we hope) get a novel published. I'll
keep you informed along the way.
Today's Blog: To see the steps in the publication process, visit my
writing website http://www.ldalford.com/ and select "production
schedule," you will be sent to http://www.sisteroflight.com/.
The four plus one basic rules I
employ when writing:
1. Don't confuse your readers.
2. Entertain your readers.
3. Ground your readers in the
writing.
4. Don't show (or tell) everything.
5. Immerse yourself in the world of
your writing.
All novels have five discrete parts:
1. The initial scene (the
beginning)
2. The rising action
3. The climax
4. The falling action
5. The dénouement
The theme statement
of my 26th novel, working title, Shape, is
this: Mrs. Lyons captures a shape-shifting girl in her pantry
and rehabilitates her.
Here is the cover proposal for Escape
from Freedom. Escape is my 25th novel.
The most important scene in any
novel is the initial scene, but eventually, you have to move to the rising
action. I'm on my first editing run-through of Shape.
I'm
an advocate of using the/a scene input/output method to drive the rising
action--in fact, to write any novel.
Scene development:
1. Scene input (easy)
2. Scene output (a little
harder)
3. Scene setting (basic stuff)
4. Creativity (creative
elements of the scene)
5. Tension (development of
creative elements to build excitement)
6. Release (climax of creative
elements)
I can immediately discern three ways
to invoke creativity:
1. History extrapolation
2. Technological extrapolation
3. Intellectual
extrapolation
Creativity is like
an extrapolation of what has been. It is a reflection of something
new created with ties to the history, science, and logic (the
intellect). Creativity requires consuming, thinking, and producing.
One of my blog readers posed these
questions. I'll use the next few weeks to answer them.
7. Words employed
8. Sentence length
9. Complexity
10. Type of grammar
11. Diction
12. Field of reference or
allusion
13. Tone - how tone is created
through diction, rhythm, sentence construction, sound effects, images created
by similes, syntax/re-arrangement of words in sentence, the inflections of the
silent or spoken voice, etc.
14. Mannerism suggest by
speech
15. Style
16. Distinct manner of writing
or speaking you employ, and why (like Pinter's style includes gaps, silences,
non-sequitors, and fragments while Chekhov's includes 'apparent'
inconclusiveness).
Moving on to 7. 7.
Words employed
The list is gone. I’d would be nice to keep it up and add to it
as I thought of more classics. I want to
give you more ideas about the employment of words or the right word for the
moment, but I’m going to come from a different point of view for a moment. Let’s look at words not to use. Here’s the list:
-ing
had
-ly
were
was
gotten
even
said
-ly
was
gotten
even
said
got
utilize
These
are words you want to reduce in your writing.
If you check every use of had, was, and were, you will get rid of most
incorrect –ing constructions too. Here
is a little more on the –ing construction in English.
-ing
Replace
weak present participle constructions like:
He
was walking.
(with
strong past tense verb constructions like)
He
walked.
-ing
Constructions in English
More on
the present participle from Bruce Judisch
I think
this is great advice:
What
I’ve discerned from writing guides and learned at writing seminars is that
participles can be used, but, like anything else, need to be used properly.
I’ve read books where they’re overused to the point of distraction, others
where they worked just fine. I raised this question to Cec Murphey at a
conference last February, and he generally concurred with the following:
The present participle normally implies that the action is being broken. “She was sitting at the table and the phone rang” is fine if the author wants to deliver the fact that the phone call disrupted her sitting at the table. To say “She sat at the table and the phone rang” doesn’t work unless she just sat down and the phone immediately rang. It depends upon the scene your describing as to which you use.
The dangling participle implies concurrent action, not sequential. “He walked to the window, looking out into the street” doesn’t work because he can’t be looking out into the street until he gets to the window. “He walked to the window and looked out into the street” gives the logical sequence of actions. "He walked to the window, rubbing his sleepy eyes" is fine because I'm describing concurrent action. To write "He walked to the window and rubbed his eyes" miscommunicates what I want to say; that is, he's rubbing his sleepy eyes while walking to the window, not after he got there.
To mix the participles, “She was sitting at the table, sipping her coffee, when the phone rang” is perfectly fine, because that’s exactly what happened. “She sat at the table, sipped her coffee, and the phone rang” is stilted, choppy and might not deliver the scene or the mood the author is striving for.
Participles are part of the English language for a reason. When and how often a writer employs them are stylistic choices. A book overloaded with participles is annoying, but so would one be lacking any of them. Like any stylistic device, they can be overused or underused—which is why there are no black-and-white rules on style. As writers, we tend to develop pet peeves on style, though, and one of yours is participles. I have mine, too. I think we all do.
The present participle normally implies that the action is being broken. “She was sitting at the table and the phone rang” is fine if the author wants to deliver the fact that the phone call disrupted her sitting at the table. To say “She sat at the table and the phone rang” doesn’t work unless she just sat down and the phone immediately rang. It depends upon the scene your describing as to which you use.
The dangling participle implies concurrent action, not sequential. “He walked to the window, looking out into the street” doesn’t work because he can’t be looking out into the street until he gets to the window. “He walked to the window and looked out into the street” gives the logical sequence of actions. "He walked to the window, rubbing his sleepy eyes" is fine because I'm describing concurrent action. To write "He walked to the window and rubbed his eyes" miscommunicates what I want to say; that is, he's rubbing his sleepy eyes while walking to the window, not after he got there.
To mix the participles, “She was sitting at the table, sipping her coffee, when the phone rang” is perfectly fine, because that’s exactly what happened. “She sat at the table, sipped her coffee, and the phone rang” is stilted, choppy and might not deliver the scene or the mood the author is striving for.
Participles are part of the English language for a reason. When and how often a writer employs them are stylistic choices. A book overloaded with participles is annoying, but so would one be lacking any of them. Like any stylistic device, they can be overused or underused—which is why there are no black-and-white rules on style. As writers, we tend to develop pet peeves on style, though, and one of yours is participles. I have mine, too. I think we all do.
More
tomorrow.
For more information, you can visit my author site http://www.ldalford.com/, and my individual novel websites:
For more information, you can visit my author site http://www.ldalford.com/, and my individual novel websites:
http://www.ancientlight.com/
http://www.aegyptnovel.com/
http://www.centurionnovel.com
http://www.thesecondmission.com/
http://www.theendofhonor.com/
http://www.thefoxshonor.com
http://www.aseasonofhonor.com
fiction, theme, plot, story, storyline,
character development, scene, setting, conversation, novel, book, writing,
information, study, marketing, tension, release, creative, idea, logic
http://www.aegyptnovel.com/
http://www.centurionnovel.com
http://www.thesecondmission.com/
http://www.theendofhonor.com/
http://www.thefoxshonor.com
http://www.aseasonofhonor.com
No comments:
Post a Comment