Writing - part x816, Writing a Novel, Changing World and Modern Writing

2 April 2019, Writing - part x816, Writing a Novel, Changing World and Modern Writing

Announcement: Delay, my new novels can be seen on the internet, but my primary publisher has gone out of business—they couldn’t succeed in the past business and publishing environment.  I'll keep you informed, but I need a new publisher.  More information can be found at www.ancientlight.com.  Check out my novels--I think you'll really enjoy them.

Introduction: I wrote the novel Aksinya: Enchantment and the Daemon. This was my 21st novel and through this blog, I gave you the entire novel in installments that included commentary on the writing. In the commentary, in addition to other general information on writing, I explained, how the novel was constructed, the metaphors and symbols in it, the writing techniques and tricks I used, and the way I built the scenes. You can look back through this blog and read the entire novel beginning with http://www.pilotlion.blogspot.com/2010/10/new-novel-part-3-girl-and-demon.html.

I'm using this novel as an example of how I produce, market, and eventually (we hope) get a novel published. I'll keep you informed along the way.

Today's Blog: To see the steps in the publication process, visit my writing website http://www.ldalford.com/ and select "production schedule," you will be sent to http://www.sisteroflight.com/.

The four plus one basic rules I employ when writing:

1. Don't confuse your readers.

2. Entertain your readers.

3. Ground your readers in the writing.

4. Don't show (or tell) everything.

     4a. Show what can be seen, heard, felt, smelled, and tasted on the stage of the novel.

5. Immerse yourself in the world of your writing.

These are the steps I use to write a novel including the five discrete parts of a novel:

1.     Design the initial scene

2.     Develop a theme statement (initial setting, protagonist, protagonist’s helper or antagonist, action statement)

a.     Research as required

b.     Develop the initial setting

c.     Develop the characters

d.     Identify the telic flaw (internal and external)

3.     Write the initial scene (identify the output: implied setting, implied characters, implied action movement)

4.     Write the next scene(s) to the climax (rising action)

5.     Write the climax scene

6.     Write the falling action scene(s)

7.     Write the dénouement scene

I finished writing my 29^th novel, working title, Detective, potential title Blue Rose: Enchantment and the Detective.  The theme statement is: Lady Azure Rose Wishart, the Chancellor of the Fae, supernatural detective, and all around dangerous girl, finds love, solves cases, breaks heads, and plays golf.  

Here is the cover proposal for Blue Rose: Enchantment and the Detective. 

Cover Proposal

The most important scene in any novel is the initial scene, but eventually, you have to move to the rising action. I am continuing to write on my 30^th novel, working title Red Sonja.  I finished my 29^th novel, working title Detective.  I’m planning to start on number 31, working title Shifter. 

How to begin a novel.  Number one thought, we need an entertaining idea.  I usually encapsulate such an idea with a theme statement.  Since I’m writing a new novel, we need a new theme statement.  Here is an initial cut.

For novel 30:  Red Sonja, a Soviet spy, infiltrates the X-plane programs at Edwards AFB as a test pilot’s administrative clerk, learns about freedom, and is redeemed.

For novel 31:  Deirdre and Sorcha are redirected to French finishing school where they discover difficult mysteries, people, and events. 

Here is the scene development outline:

1. Scene input (comes from the previous scene output or is an initial scene)

2. Write the scene setting (place, time, stuff, and characters)

3. Imagine the output, creative elements, plot, telic flaw resolution (climax) and develop the tension and release.

4. Write the scene using the output and creative elements to build the tension.

5. Write the release

6. Write the kicker

          

Today:  Why don’t we go back to the basics and just writing a novel?  I can tell you what I do, and show you how I go about putting a novel together.  We can start with developing an idea then move into the details of the writing. 

To start a novel, I picture an initial scene.  I may start from a protagonist or just launch into mental development of an initial scene.  I get the idea for an initial scene from all kinds of sources.  To help get the creative juices flowing, let’s look at the initial scene. 

1.     Meeting between the protagonist and the antagonist or the protagonist’s helper

2.     Action point in the plot

3.     Buildup to an exciting scene

4.     Indirect introduction of the protagonist

The protagonist is the novel and the initial scene.  If you look at the four basic types of initial scenes, you see the reflection of the protagonist in each one.  If you noticed my examples yesterday, I expressed the scene idea, but none were completely independent of the protagonist.  Indeed, in most cases, I get an idea with a protagonist.  The protagonist is incomplete, but a sketch to begin with.  You can start with a protagonist, but in my opinion, as we see above, the protagonist is never completely independent from the initial scene.  As the ideas above imply, we can start with the characters, specifically the protagonist, antagonist or protagonist’s helper, and develop an initial scene. 

Let’s look at a subject that is really ignored in the modern era.  I’m not certain how much this can help your current writing.  I would argue that theoretically, this subject can really help those who write historical and futuristic fiction.  It depends on how your write your historical and futuristic fiction.  There are two ways to write historical fiction—let’s look at this.

The first and most common way to write historical fiction is to write a novel that projects modern ideas and history as historical ideas and history.  In other words to present modern ideas and historical ideas as the same.  I think this is perhaps the most egregious and perverse means of presenting a false view of history.  The author is either completely ignorant of the past, is intentionally attempting to education people in a false view of history, or both.  The real historical world is very different both culturally and socially from our current world.  The true author attempts to convey this in historical writing.

The second and less common means of historical writing is to actually incorporate the past into a novel to convey the actual way people thought and acted in the past.  This approach actually goes back into time to give a complete view of the way the people thought and acted.  To this end, let’s look at how the world changed and how people thought in the past.  This is more of a historical look at the world for the purpose of understanding how the world worked in the past and how people thought and acted.  We’ll use historical information to see what concerned affected their lives. Here is a list of potential issues.  We’ll look at them in detail:

1.   Vocabulary

2.   Ideas

3.   Social construction

4.   Culture

5.   Politics

6.   History

7.   Language

8.   Common knowledge

9.   Common sense

10. Reflected culture

11. Reflected history

12. Reflected society

13. Truth

14. Food

15. Weapons

16. Transportation

17. Communication

18. Writing 

Literacy brought about perhaps the greatest change in thought.  You can see that directly out of literacy, the ancient Greeks invented the three ways to know truth.  We use these ideas to record history, continue rule of law, create science and technology, develop mathematics and philosophy, and basically progress human invention and society.  There is much more that came out of literacy.

I gave you examples of how the ancient Greeks and Hebrews wrote.  So the question at hand is how do we write modern writing and does it matter? 

First, the form of writing supersedes anything in writing.  This is not a question of style, technique, methods, or grammar.  This is the step above grammar and is specifically how, in English, do we arrange our writing so that it is understandable to other English speakers.  If you were to write in the ancient Greek’s logos to telos form, no one would understand what you are doing and people would not enjoy your writing.  Let’s put it another way.  When you were forced to read the Greek dialogs, what was your opinion of the entertainment value of them?  Plays are a little better, but not much better.  Plays play better as plays and not as reading literature.  If you notice, plays are more akin to ancient writing mnemonics in that they are memorized and spoken or acted in a logos since (stated as a dialog).  A Greek dialog might do better if acted out like a play.

Likewise, ancient Hebrew documents confuse many readers.  Even readers who enjoy and somewhat understand the ancient Hebrew are likely to misunderstand it if they don’t know that the form is a synopsis/body.  This is the constant problem with translations and especially translations from ancient languages.  Today the form of writing is similar across many languages because of Western Civilization and English writing.

Here’s the rub.  We number one want our readers to read and be entertained by our writing.  The bottom line is your writing must be understandable.  If you don’t follow the common English and modern form, your writing will not be understandable.  You are lucky because the common English form is the same as Latin and Latin form has become the form of most all Western Languages. 

The Romans developed the form of: intro, body, and conclusion.  We see this form in all technical writing, most fiction, and it should be the form of every narrative paragraph.  I hope you were taught when you were young that the form of a proper paragraph in English is intro, body, and conclusion.  I know you were taught that the form of any technical writing or paper is intro, body, and conclusion.  I hope you were taught this as the form of the paragraph.  If you weren’t, consider yourself informed.

In English, we write using the form: intro, body, and conclusion.  This is significantly different from the ancient Greek logos to an unstated telos or the ancient Hebrew synopsis/body.  If you don’t see how this is a critical point in writing, I’m not sure how to advise you.  The Greeks intentionally don’t state the conclusion of their writing—they expected the readers to figure it out for themselves from the logos (the logical argument).  Romans and we don’t think this way.  If you notice, Hebrew writing usually doesn’t have a conclusion at all.  In English, this is like proposing a joke without giving the punchline.  The Romans loved the Greeks and the Greek ways, but what likely drove them crazy was the fact that Greek jokes never had a punchline.  Ancient Hebrew is similar.

To be very clear, English and modern writing in English and most modern languages expect the form of intro, body, and conclusion.  This information is absolutely critical to writing fiction (and all other modern writing).  This is the means of expression in English.  It is also a huge change in ideas from the past until now.  That’s the point, the form of writing is both dependent on the language and the culture.  There are also social forms—most based in history and time.

More tomorrow.

For more information, you can visit my author site http://www.ldalford.com/, and my individual novel websites:

http://www.ancientlight.com/
http://www.aegyptnovel.com/
http://www.centurionnovel.com
http://www.thesecondmission.com/
http://www.theendofhonor.com/
http://www.thefoxshonor.com
http://www.aseasonofhonor.com  

fiction, theme, plot, story, storyline, character development, scene, setting, conversation, novel, book, writing, information, study, marketing, tension, release, creative, idea, logic