My Favorites

Friday, April 26, 2019

Writing - part x840, Writing a Novel, Changing World and Fiction

26 April 2019, Writing - part x840, Writing a Novel, Changing World and Fiction

Announcement: Delay, my new novels can be seen on the internet, but my primary publisher has gone out of business—they couldn’t succeed in the past business and publishing environment.  I'll keep you informed, but I need a new publisher.  More information can be found at www.ancientlight.com.  Check out my novels--I think you'll really enjoy them.

Introduction: I wrote the novel Aksinya: Enchantment and the Daemon. This was my 21st novel and through this blog, I gave you the entire novel in installments that included commentary on the writing. In the commentary, in addition to other general information on writing, I explained, how the novel was constructed, the metaphors and symbols in it, the writing techniques and tricks I used, and the way I built the scenes. You can look back through this blog and read the entire novel beginning with http://www.pilotlion.blogspot.com/2010/10/new-novel-part-3-girl-and-demon.html.

I'm using this novel as an example of how I produce, market, and eventually (we hope) get a novel published. I'll keep you informed along the way.

Today's Blog: To see the steps in the publication process, visit my writing website http://www.ldalford.com/ and select "production schedule," you will be sent to http://www.sisteroflight.com/.
The four plus one basic rules I employ when writing:
1. Don't confuse your readers.
2. Entertain your readers.
3. Ground your readers in the writing.
4. Don't show (or tell) everything.
     4a. Show what can be seen, heard, felt, smelled, and tasted on the stage of the novel.
5. Immerse yourself in the world of your writing.
These are the steps I use to write a novel including the five discrete parts of a novel:

1.     Design the initial scene
2.     Develop a theme statement (initial setting, protagonist, protagonist’s helper or antagonist, action statement)
a.     Research as required
b.     Develop the initial setting
c.     Develop the characters
d.     Identify the telic flaw (internal and external)
3.     Write the initial scene (identify the output: implied setting, implied characters, implied action movement)
4.     Write the next scene(s) to the climax (rising action)
5.     Write the climax scene
6.     Write the falling action scene(s)
7.     Write the dénouement scene
I finished writing my 29th novel, working title, Detective, potential title Blue Rose: Enchantment and the Detective.  The theme statement is: Lady Azure Rose Wishart, the Chancellor of the Fae, supernatural detective, and all around dangerous girl, finds love, solves cases, breaks heads, and plays golf.  
Here is the cover proposal for Blue Rose: Enchantment and the Detective
Cover Proposal
The most important scene in any novel is the initial scene, but eventually, you have to move to the rising action. I am continuing to write on my 30th novel, working title Red Sonja.  I finished my 29th novel, working title Detective.  I’m planning to start on number 31, working title Shifter
How to begin a novel.  Number one thought, we need an entertaining idea.  I usually encapsulate such an idea with a theme statement.  Since I’m writing a new novel, we need a new theme statement.  Here is an initial cut.

For novel 30:  Red Sonja, a Soviet spy, infiltrates the X-plane programs at Edwards AFB as a test pilot’s administrative clerk, learns about freedom, and is redeemed.

For novel 31:  Deirdre and Sorcha are redirected to French finishing school where they discover difficult mysteries, people, and events. 

Here is the scene development outline:

1. Scene input (comes from the previous scene output or is an initial scene)
2. Write the scene setting (place, time, stuff, and characters)
3. Imagine the output, creative elements, plot, telic flaw resolution (climax) and develop the tension and release.
4. Write the scene using the output and creative elements to build the tension.
5. Write the release
6. Write the kicker
          
Today:  Why don’t we go back to the basics and just writing a novel?  I can tell you what I do, and show you how I go about putting a novel together.  We can start with developing an idea then move into the details of the writing. 

To start a novel, I picture an initial scene.  I may start from a protagonist or just launch into mental development of an initial scene.  I get the idea for an initial scene from all kinds of sources.  To help get the creative juices flowing, let’s look at the initial scene. 

1.     Meeting between the protagonist and the antagonist or the protagonist’s helper
2.     Action point in the plot
3.     Buildup to an exciting scene
4.     Indirect introduction of the protagonist

The protagonist is the novel and the initial scene.  If you look at the four basic types of initial scenes, you see the reflection of the protagonist in each one.  If you noticed my examples yesterday, I expressed the scene idea, but none were completely independent of the protagonist.  Indeed, in most cases, I get an idea with a protagonist.  The protagonist is incomplete, but a sketch to begin with.  You can start with a protagonist, but in my opinion, as we see above, the protagonist is never completely independent from the initial scene.  As the ideas above imply, we can start with the characters, specifically the protagonist, antagonist or protagonist’s helper, and develop an initial scene. 

Let’s look at a subject that is really ignored in the modern era.  I’m not certain how much this can help your current writing.  I would argue that theoretically, this subject can really help those who write historical and futuristic fiction.  It depends on how your write your historical and futuristic fiction.  There are two ways to write historical fiction—let’s look at this.

The first and most common way to write historical fiction is to write a novel that projects modern ideas and history as historical ideas and history.  In other words to present modern ideas and historical ideas as the same.  I think this is perhaps the most egregious and perverse means of presenting a false view of history.  The author is either completely ignorant of the past, is intentionally attempting to education people in a false view of history, or both.  The real historical world is very different both culturally and socially from our current world.  The true author attempts to convey this in historical writing.

The second and less common means of historical writing is to actually incorporate the past into a novel to convey the actual way people thought and acted in the past.  This approach actually goes back into time to give a complete view of the way the people thought and acted.  To this end, let’s look at how the world changed and how people thought in the past.  This is more of a historical look at the world for the purpose of understanding how the world worked in the past and how people thought and acted.  We’ll use historical information to see what concerned affected their lives. Here is a list of potential issues.  We’ll look at them in detail:

1.   Vocabulary
2.   Ideas
3.   Social construction
4.   Culture
5.   Politics
6.   History
7.   Language
8.   Common knowledge
9.   Common sense
10. Reflected culture
11. Reflected history
12. Reflected society
13. Truth
14. Food
15. Weapons
16. Transportation
17. Communication
18. Writing 

Most people have no idea how writing and reading came about.  They assume that people always read and write just like they do today—the truth is much further than they can imagine.  The Greeks invented or rather developed something else in writing.

Until the modern era, let’s say from about 1,000 AD, people really didn’t care much about the difference between fiction and nonfiction.  Not that they mixed them much together—there was so little of either that it didn’t matter much.  Most of the nonfiction was obvious and there was little acknowledgement of fiction.  It also came out of the way the ancient Greeks wrote.  All ancient Greek writing is a logos (logical argument) to an unstated telos (conclusion).  The fact of fiction or nonfiction was immaterial, the point was the logos.  That isn’t to say ancient Greek literature isn’t nonfiction—the Greeks invented the historical-legal method after all.  The point is that ancient Greek fiction reflects the historical-legal method through a logos to unstated telos.  The logos points out what is important and draws the reader to the telos.  The Greek approach to the historical-legal method is like a court trial, the facts matter only to the point that they prove the logos and reach the telos—everything else is extraneous and is not included.  You can see this in the New Testament Gospels.

In the Gospels, the Greeks did not include anything that didn’t lead to the telos of the logos of the writing.  In English and Latin writing, the writers tended to include everything including the extraneous and allow the reader to exclude unimportant information.  We see this today.  Although in English writing, you aren’t supposed to include the extraneous, the purpose of English and modern writing is wholly entertainment.  The entertainment is what matters and not the conclusions or argument.  In English writing, you will see the writer intentionally exclude that which isn’t entertaining.  You might find the English writer of nonfiction emphasizing the entertaining and leaving our or deemphasizing the unentertaining.  Which is a better method of writing?

The upshot of ancient Greek logos to telos is that each of the four accepted and extant Gospels has a different emphasis on the logos to telos—none of them really care how many people were at the grave of Christ.  None of them care about the precise time and details pertaining to the time or numbers.  The reason is the ancient Greek style of literature.  It is a historical logos to telos and the writers would tell you they were expressing precisely that a historical logos to an unstated telos.  To them, the precise details weren’t as important at the logos and the unstated telos.  Likewise, a modern English writer would tell you they were writing an entertaining history.  It is an accurate history from the standpoint of entertainment.  You might ask what you are missing.  The Greeks would say you are missing nothing because the point is the logical argument to the unstated conclusion.  The modern English writer would say you are missing something because their point is entertainment and not necessarily reflecting history.  Just say’n.

This is why you need to understand history and culture as well as the style or method of writing.   

More tomorrow.

For more information, you can visit my author site http://www.ldalford.com/, and my individual novel websites:

fiction, theme, plot, story, storyline, character development, scene, setting, conversation, novel, book, writing, information, study, marketing, tension, release, creative, idea, logic

No comments:

Post a Comment